http://www.ashdodsurf.com/strongest-earthquake-3/
 |
No items matching your keywords were found.
strongest earthquake
How strong was the earthquake in Okinawa on January 15, 2010?
We felt an earthquake last night and was wondering how strong it was!
There was an earthquake 90 miles WNW of Okinawa with a magnitude of 5.3.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
 |
Quakehold! 88111 Museum Putty Neutral
List Price:  |
DescriptionNon-Toxic |
 |
Ingersoll-Rand 109XPA 3/8-inch Air Ratchet Wrench
List Price: |
DescriptionThis Ingersoll Rand air ratchet wrench features an optimized gear ratio and airflow for extra performance, coupled with exceptional durability. Drive (in.): 3/8, Speed - No Load (RPM): 220, Average Air Consumption (CFM): 3, CFM at Load: 24, Max... |
 |
MiniBeam Sportsmen® (Green LED flashlight) - Preserves night vision, attracts fish, won't spook game, doesn't attract bugs.
List Price: |
DescriptionThe camouflage MiniBeam comes with special green LED lights that won't spook fish, don't attract bugs, and enhance peripheral night vision. The powerful LED flashlight can be seen up to a mile away. It is engineered to be water proof, shock proof, and it floats, making it the premiere flashlight for water related activities... |
 |
How to Build a Concrete Dome House: How to Build the Strongest, Most Fireproof, Tornado and Earthquake-resistant Concrete Dome House
List Price: |
DescriptionHOW TO BUILD THE STRONGEST FIREPROOF, TORNADO AND EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT CONCRETE DOME HOUSE. I think the title says it all. If you wanted to build a house in which you can feel safe no matter what nature throws at it, now you can... |
 |
MiniBeam Tactical ® (Red LED flashlight) - Enhanced reading in the dark, floating, waterproof, shockproof
List Price: |
DescriptionMiniBeam is an tiny yet powerful LED flashlight that can be seen up to a mile away. It is engineered to be water proof, shock proof, and it floats, making it the premiere flashlight for water related activities... |
New Exclusive Haiti Earthquake Pictures, 7.0 (New January 13)
One Comment
What is wrong with Svensmarks Forbush paper?
That was discussed on WUWT a while ago [August?]
In that thread from august I find two objections (Maybe this isn’t the place to continue that discussion, anyway here I go): 1. You seem to think that Svensmark used an invalid method to select Forbush events. 2. You seem to think that there a too few events in the analysis.
Regarding number 1. The events were ranked according to the level of ionization of the lower atmosphere. I don’t see what’s wrong with that? Would GCRs count be a better method of selection or how are you supposed to do this?
Regarding number 2. There are not that many events to analyze to start with and the Aeronet network has taken measurements only from 1998 onwards. In other scientific areas it is a valid method to look at strongest events while studying a phenomenon, e.g. you can study the strongest earthquakes, strongest hurricanes, strongest meteorite impacts etc. Why isn’t it OK to analyze the five strongest Forbush decreases?]]>